RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01599
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 2 Jul 13 be removed from the
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She has a pre-existing medical condition, which interfered with
her completion of her FA. This condition resulted in the loss
of bladder control during two portions of her assessment (sit-up
and run).
In support of her request, the applicant provided a copy of a
letter explaining her medical condition, copy of an AF Form 108,
Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, dated 18
Jul 13, and copies of her medical records related to this
condition.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of Master Sergeant.
The applicants last five FA scores are as follows:
Date Results
03 Oct 14 Excellent
20 Sep 13 Excellent
* 02 Jul 13 Unsatisfactory
05 Dec 12 Satisfactory
08 Jun 12 Satisfactory
* Contested FA test.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating the applicant has not
exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior
to seeking correction of her military records.
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct
13, any military member can appeal his/her FA via Wing Appeal
and subsequently thought the AF Fitness Appeals Board (FAAB),
within two years of discovering an error/injustice. In this
case, the applicants appeal has not been considered by her Wing
Commander, nor has it been reviewed by the FAAB; therefore, the
applicants request has not been submitted in accordance with
Air Force guidance.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 23 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In this
respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level
of appeal within the Air Force. As such, an applicant must
first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief
provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief
before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force
Instruction. The Air Force office of primary responsibility has
reviewed this application and indicated there is an available
avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not yet
pursued. Therefore, in view of the above, we find no basis to
grant the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified she has not exhausted all available
avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting her
application to the BCMR and the application will only be
reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of
administrative relief.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01599 in Executive Session on 7 Apr 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01599 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Mar 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 5 May 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Jan 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03694.docx
According to the documentation submitted by the applicant, on 16 May 14, the applicant received an AF Form 469, exempting him from the 1.5 mile run, 2km walk, and push-up component until 9 Jul 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial based upon the fact that the applicant has not exhausted...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02107
However, she tested three days later on 16 May 2014 and received a measurement of 30.5 which led to a satisfactory score. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 November 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03671
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03671 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 16 Mar 11 and 14 Jul 11 Fitness Assessments (FAs) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military records. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00472
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a medical condition at the time he took the FA in question which was not documented on an AF Form 422 and prevented him from achieving a passing score. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial based upon the fact that the applicant has not exhausted all available...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05761
In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, any military member can appeal their FA through a wing-level appeals board and then through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) within two years of discovering the error/injustice. The applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00709
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for the removal of the contested FA due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. In this respect, this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit B. DD Form 149, dated 24 Mar 14, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03880
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03880 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 26 Jul 13 be corrected to reflect Satisfactory in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00787
Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error or injustice. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03423
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military records. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00530
On 31 Jan 13, the applicant participated in one of the contested FAs where he attained an overall composite score of 33.50 points, which constituted an unsatisfactory rating AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military record. If the administrative appeal is not successful, the applicant may resubmit the DD Form 149, Application for Correction of...